ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Dengue vaccine acceptability in Peru: A mixed-methods study in two dengue-endemic Peruvian cities.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices about dengue vaccines in Latin America and the Caribbean: a scoping review.Cadernos de saude publica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDengue poses a major public health challenge in Peru, with Piura and Iquitos experiencing recurrent outbreaks and limited control options. A dengue vaccine could complement current vector control strategies and reduce transmission, yet community perceptions and barriers to uptake in pre-implementation settings remain poorly understood. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsOur mixed-methods study design was conducted in Piura and Iquitos, guided by the 5C's Framework of Vaccine Hesitancy. Sixteen focus group discussions (n = 147) explored acceptability and concerns regarding a hypothetical future dengue vaccine; a subsequent survey (n = 883) quantified vaccine acceptability. Dengue vaccine acceptability was operationalized using a theory-driven, multi-item outcome contrasting individuals willing to vaccinate ("acceptors") with those unsure about accepting vaccination ("unsure"). Multivariable logistic regression examined factors associated with vaccine uncertainty.
resultsUsing the multi-item, theory-driven classification, most (81.9%) survey participants were classified as "acceptors", 14.5% were "unsure", and 3.6% would refuse all vaccines ("refusers"). Qualitative findings underscored the need for clear information on efficacy, eligibility, and side effects, provided by trusted health professionals. In multivariable analysis, compared to acceptors, the "unsures" had more negative views towards COVID-19 vaccination (OR 2.17), higher technical or higher education (OR 3.33), and reduced confidence due to the rapid COVID-19 vaccine development (OR 2.17). The "unsures" also expressed less trust in vaccine benefits (OR 0.25), less willingness to pay for a dengue vaccine (OR 0.40), and lower knowledge of dengue transmission (OR 0.45) compared to the acceptors.
conclusionsAlthough most participants expressed willingness to receive a future dengue vaccine, vaccine uncertainty was primarily shaped by factors related to confidence, convenience, and communication. Mistrust in vaccines in general or residual mistrust linked to COVID-19 vaccination experiences, and concerns about vaccine development may hinder acceptance. Tailored communication, engaging trusted local leaders, and ensuring easy access are critical for successful dengue vaccination campaigns in these endemic regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.