ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Strengthening frontline capacity for skin neglected tropical diseases: Findings from a global survey.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSkin-related neglected tropical diseases (skin NTDs) remain a major source of morbidity in resource-limited settings. These conditions include Buruli ulcer, chromoblastomycosis and other deep mycoses, cutaneous leishmaniasis, post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis, leprosy, lymphatic filariasis, mycetoma, noma, onchocerciasis, scabies, tungiasis, and yaws. Recent efforts have focused on developing training materials to help frontline health workers diagnose and treat skin NTDs. However, little is known about how these materials are perceived and utilized in endemic regions. We performed a global online survey to identify gaps and establish priorities for future training resource development.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional, anonymous online survey to assess training needs for skin NTDs. The survey was disseminated by the World Health Organization's Global Neglected Tropical Diseases Programme via the WHO website, targeted email distribution to NTD professionals, and outreach on LinkedIn. Respondents identified skin NTDs most urgently requiring improved training resources in their settings and reported on priority topics, target audiences, languages, formats, and barriers to access.
resultsA total of 308 participants from 48 countries completed the survey during the one-month response period. The three most frequently reported skin NTDs in need of additional training resources were leprosy (64.6%), scabies (60.7%), and lymphatic filariasis (55.6%). Early detection and diagnosis were the most prioritized training topics (86.0%). Most respondents preferred English-language resources (62.7%), with printed manuals and guidelines identified as the most useful format (70.1%). The most commonly reported barrier was limited availability of up-to-date materials (75.3%).
conclusionsWe highlight persistent gaps in the accessibility of training materials for skin NTDs. While many high-quality resources exist, their dissemination, adaptation, and translation remain limited. Respondent-identified priorities provide a framework to enhance training resources, strengthen the capacity of frontline healthcare workers, and ultimately advance global skin NTD control, elimination, and eradication goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.