ArticlePloS one2026
Estimating particle size and velocity from fluorescence pulses: A practical validation study of flow cytometry signals analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When particles cross optimal measurement regions in a flow cytometer, they generate time-resolved signals (pulses) that contain valuable information. However, this information is lost when signals are reduced to scalars such as area, width, and height. Because flow cytometers convolve particle properties with the laser profile and geometric factors of the optical interrogation region, it is in theory possible to estimate the particle diameter, velocity, and brightness (effectively its fluorophore concentration or scattering factors) from the time-resolved data alone. Here, we independently vary the velocity, size and dye concentration to validate their unique contributions to signal shape under flow conditions in which particle trajectories are well controlled. Through a series of flow rate variations on microspheres of known size and fluorophore concentrations, we study the magnitude of changes in time-resolved signals and the impact on estimation of particle properties. The method was applied to cells labeled with a DNA binding dye, which is frequently used to classify cells whether cells are in pre- (G0/G1; 1x DNA label) or post mitosis (G2; 2x DNA label) phase of the cell cycle. Using our signals analysis, we found a 1.26-fold increase in the apparent diameter from G0/G1 to G2 populations. This shift corresponds to an approximate doubling of the volume of a sphere, which is consistent with literature and microscopy data. Overall, this work validates that fluorescence pulses acquired in flow cytometry can be used to estimate and remove sources of uncertainty (e.g., due to velocity changes) and to extract information about the size, velocity, and biomarker concentrations of particles and cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.