Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42149877›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The effect of tempi and mode on the rating of the perceived emotion in music.

Ulvhild Helena Færøvik, Karsten Specht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ulvhild Helena FærøvikDepartment of Clinical and Biological Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6460-6245
Karsten SpechtDepartment of Clinical and Biological Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9946-3704

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the impact of tempi variations (60, 100, 120, and 150 beats per minute) and major and minor modes on the perceived emotional content of music. To explore this, we created eight versions of five original compositions, resulting in 40 musical stimuli. Control stimuli included variants of white, brown, and pink noise, as well as six human voice recordings. A total of 1280 participants took part in an online survey. Participants were diverse, comprising 262 musicians (defined as individuals with over six years of instrument-playing experience who identified as amateur, semi-professional, or professional). Participants were asked to rate the perceived emotional content of the stimuli, using the second-order factors of the GEMS-9 framework: 'sublimity', 'unease', and 'vitality'. We employed a mixed between-within-subjects analysis of variance to analyse the data. Specifically examining the influence of the four tempi, the two modes, while controlling for musicianship, gender, age, and education level. Results showed that as tempi increased, compositions were consistently rated as less sublimity and more vitality, in both major and minor modes. A higher tempi in the major mode resulted in lower ratings of uneasiness. There were also several significant findings for musicianship, gender, and education level, although these mostly had small effect sizes. For age groups, there were two substantial differences between the groups with larger effect sizes. Overall, our findings suggest that tempi and mode significantly influence how compositions are rated for sublimity, unease, and vitality, as they interact.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionEmotionsMusicAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42149877
PMCPMC13183231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.