ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Sports-based mental health promotion for adolescents in rural Nepal: A pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescent mental health disorders are a leading contributor to the global burden of disease, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where access to care is limited. Sport offers a promising platform for mental health promotion, but evidence from rigorous evaluations in these settings is lacking. In Nepal we tested the feasibility of a mental health promotion intervention comprising football, dance and martial arts coaching and community engagement through melas (community celebrations), home visits and consultation with community advisory groups. We conducted a parallel-group, two-arm superiority pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial with 1:1 allocation ratio. The study area was four community clusters (~1000 population per cluster). We conducted pre-intervention (n = 440) and post-intervention (n = 403) cross-sectional surveys of all adolescents aged 12-19 living in the clusters. The intervention was implemented for 10 months and open to all aged 12-19. Control was sport as usual. We collected data according to pre-specified progression criteria and compared trial arms post-intervention for wellbeing, depression, anxiety, self-esteem, self-efficacy, emotion regulation, social support and functional impairment. Among adolescents in intervention clusters 110/224 (49.11%) attended ≥5 sessions. Younger age and belonging to the least privileged caste group was associated with attendance. In 146/191 (76.44%) sessions, coaches demonstrated ≥75% of activities at satisfactory/superior level according to a fidelity checklist. We found only a small and uncertain difference in wellbeing between arms (effect size 0.05, 95% confidence interval -0.45 to 0.64) but moderate evidence towards improved depression (-0.32, -0.67 to 0.02), anxiety (-0.27, -0.61 to 0.06) and social support from a significant other (0.41, 0.05 to 0.77) in the intervention arm. The average implementation cost per session was $67.63 ($0.07 per adolescent in the community per session). Findings suggest the intervention is feasible and might help to reduce mental health inequities. Progression to a phase III trial is warranted.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.