ArticlePloS one2026
Sociodemographic and mental health predictors of mental health service use across provider types.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine trends in mental health service use across four provider types (family doctors, psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers) and identify sociodemographic predictors of provider-specific access in Canada.
methodsThis study analyzes seven cycles (2007-2020) of the Canadian Community Health Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Trends over time were examined using weighted proportions and counts of service users. Weighted multivariable logistic regression models were applied to the 2019-2020 cycle to assess associations between sociodemographic factors and provider-specific service use.
resultsFamily doctors were consistently the most accessed providers for mental health concerns, followed by psychologists and social workers, with psychiatrists being least accessed. Psychologist and social worker use increased between 2017 and 2019. In the adjusted regression models (2019-2020), women had higher odds of using family doctors (AOR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.05-1.39) and social workers (1.19, 1.02-1.40) and lower odds of psychiatrists (AOR = 0.66, 95% CI:0.55-0.79) than men. Adults 65 + had greater odds of family-doctor use (AOR = 4.82, 95% CI: 3.59-6.47) and lower odds of psychologist (AOR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.24-0.45) and social-worker use (AOR = 0.21, 95% CI:0.16-0.29) than ages 12-17. Post-secondary education (vs less than secondary school) was associated with higher psychologist use (AOR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.12-2.98). Higher income (≥$80,000 vs < $20,000) was associated with lower psychiatrist use (AOR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.86). Non-Indigenous respondents more often used psychologists (AOR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.13-2.23), and respondents who are not a visible minority more often used family doctors (AOR = 1.37, 95% CI:1.06-1.77).
conclusionThis study reveals a stratified mental health care system in Canada, where sociodemographic factors shape who accesses which providers. While primary care dominates, growth in psychologist and social worker use suggests shifting patterns of engagement. Findings underscore the need for policies that address financial and structural barriers, promote equitable access, and expand coverage for community-based mental health providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.