ArticleJMIR AI2026
Evaluating Medical Students' Perceptions of AI-Assisted Clinical Documentation (CarePilot): Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into health care to streamline documentation and improve clinician efficiency. AI-powered documentation tools, such as CarePilot, may reduce administrative burdens and help mitigate burnout. However, their usability and perceived value among medical trainees remain underexplored. Objective: This study aims to evaluate medical students' perceptions of usability, efficiency, and satisfaction when using an AI-powered documentation system in a simulated clinical setting. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Burnett School of Medicine at Texas Christian University. A total of 44 third- and fourth-year medical students participated in a standardized patient encounter for a headache. Using CarePilot, participants documented patient history, physical examination findings, clinical reasoning, and management decisions. Afterward, they completed a 27-item Likert scale survey assessing ease of use, documentation efficiency, organization, and overall satisfaction. Results: The majority of respondents rated ease of use, learnability, interface likability, and documentation organization positively (with over 75% of respondents reporting satisfaction for each item). However, a subset reported neutral or dissatisfied opinions regarding overall satisfaction (13/44, 29.5%), citing workflow interruptions and limited functionality that could affect patient interaction. Conclusions: CarePilot was generally perceived as user-friendly and effective for organizing documentation. Nonetheless, areas for refinement, particularly workflow integration and expanded functionalities, may enhance satisfaction and clinical applicability. These findings inform future design and implementation strategies for AI-powered documentation tools in health care education and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.