ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026
Exploring the influence of electoral political orientation on health outcomes: a scoping review.
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Political orientation has been linked to short-term health outcomes, yet its long-term effects remain underexplored. Given the influence of political contexts on health, understanding these associations is crucial for public health. This scoping review synthesizes the literature on how political orientation (reflected in voting patterns) relates to health indicators, vaccination behavior, and mental health outcomes. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, including peer-reviewed and grey literature. A total of 53 studies met the chosen eligibility criteria. The findings show that political orientation significantly shapes health outcomes: more conservative regions show poorer general health indicators, lower vaccination rates, and higher vaccine hesitancy. Political orientation was also associated with increased anxiety, depression, and stress. The included studies employed diverse methodologies (some of which included causal inference techniques to strengthen their analysis). Overall, the results underscore the role of political context in shaping health behaviors and outcomes, emphasizing the need for public health strategies that consider these dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.