Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42149561›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2026

Rapid Respiratory Microbiological Point-of-Care Testing and Antibiotic Use in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Alastair D Hay, Samantha Abbs, Matthew Ridd, Stephen Granier, J Athene Lane, Peter Muir, Jodi Taylor, Grace Young, Kathy Eastwood, Hayley Dash and 11 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Alastair D HayCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Samantha AbbsBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Matthew RiddCentre for Applied Excellence in Skin and Allergy Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Stephen GranierWhiteladies Medical Group, Bristol, United Kingdom.
J Athene LaneBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Peter MuirUK Health Security Agency South West Regional Laboratory, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jodi TaylorBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Grace YoungBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Kathy EastwoodBristol, United Kingdom.
Hayley DashBristol, United Kingdom.
Lynne BradshawBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Rebecca ClarkeSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Mandy LuiBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Emma BridgemanBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Rachel C M BrierleyBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Emily BrownCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Hannah V ThorntonGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, United Kingdom.
Paul M MitchellHealth Economics and Health Policy, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Liang ZhuBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Lucy YardleySchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Chris MetcalfeBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceMost antibiotic prescribing takes place in primary care, driving antimicrobial resistance, a top-10 threat to global public health. There is considerable international interest in whether rapid multiplex microbiological point-of-care testing (RM-POCT) can safely reduce antibiotic prescribing in primary care.

objectiveTo investigate whether the use of a RM-POCT can safely reduce same-day antibiotic prescribing for children and adults presenting to primary care with respiratory infections. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis parallel-group randomized clinical trial was conducted at 16 general practices in Southwest England between December 2022 and April 2024. Patients were eligible if they were aged 12 months or older, presented with any clinician-diagnosed acute (≤21 days) respiratory tract infection, and the patient or clinician believed antibiotic treatment was, or might be, necessary. Participants were randomized (1:1) to RM-POCT or usual care. The research team, including those conducting statistical analyses, were unaware of group allocation. Data were analyzed from November 21, 2024, to March 13, 2025.

interventionPatients in the intervention group were tested with RM-POCT to indicate the presence or absence of 19 respiratory viral pathogens and 4 atypical bacteria in approximately 45 minutes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was same-day antibiotic prescribing. The safety outcome was patient-reported symptom severity on days 2 to 4.

resultsAmong 552 included patients (mean [SD] age, 40.0 [21.2] years; 349 [63%] female), 276 were randomized to the intervention group and 276 to usual care. Primary outcome data were available for all participants, and safety outcome data were available in 216 intervention participants (78%) and 203 usual care participants (74%). Same-day antibiotics were prescribed to 124 participants (45%) in each group (odds ratio [OR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.41]; P > .99). Prespecified subgroup analyses showed evidence of differentially reduced antibiotic prescribing in participants from whom a virus was detected (OR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.63]; P for interaction < .001) and those with chronic lung disease (OR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.28 to 1.09]; P for interaction = .046) but not children younger than 16 years (OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 0.64 to 4.74]; P for interaction = .24), nor where patients and clinicians disagreed on antibiotic necessity (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.63 to 1.98]; P for interaction = .53). There was no difference in symptom severity on days 2 to 4 between groups (difference in means, 0.09 [95% CI, -0.10 to 0.27]; P = .36). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial among patients with respiratory tract infections being considered for antibiotic treatment in primary care, use of an RM-POCT did not reduce same-day antibiotic prescribing or worsen patient outcomes. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16039192.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPoint-of-Care TestingRespiratory Tract InfectionsAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareRapid Diagnostic TestsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID42149561
PMCPMC13184781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.