Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42149457›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Assessment of Acute Wound Healing Using Excisional Mouse Tail Skin Wound Models.

Iqra Fatima, Andrey A Sharov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Iqra FatimaDepartment of Dermatology, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrey A SharovDepartment of Dermatology, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. drsharov@bu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7240-304X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing is a major medical challenge as acute injuries affect millions annually, while chronic wounds such as diabetic foot and venous leg ulcers persist in 1-2% of patients, driving substantial morbidity and ~4% of global health-care expenditure. In response to an injury, restoration of skin barrier is critical process and regulated at multiple levels involving coordinated communications and interaction among keratinocytes, immune cells, and fibroblasts. In vivo mouse models are essential for dissecting the cellular and molecular regulators of normal and pathological repair, especially given the availability of transgenic tools and cell-sorting methods. However, the most common back-punch excisional model heals predominantly by panniculus carnosus-mediated contraction (up to 90%), which limits granulation tissue formation and affects reepithelialization. The mouse tail excisional model provides an alternative to back-punch model as wound closure yielding robust granulation and epithelial coverage due to the "splinting" effect of the tail structure. Here, we describe a detailed, reproducible protocol for tail excisional wounds optimized for histology, cryosectioning, and downstream cell isolation for single-cell multi-omic analyses.

Indexed as

SkinTailWound HealingAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMiceGranulation tissueMouse modelPathological repairSkin regeneration reepithelializationSkin wound healingTail excisional model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.