ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026
Assessment of Acute Wound Healing Using Excisional Mouse Tail Skin Wound Models.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound healing is a major medical challenge as acute injuries affect millions annually, while chronic wounds such as diabetic foot and venous leg ulcers persist in 1-2% of patients, driving substantial morbidity and ~4% of global health-care expenditure. In response to an injury, restoration of skin barrier is critical process and regulated at multiple levels involving coordinated communications and interaction among keratinocytes, immune cells, and fibroblasts. In vivo mouse models are essential for dissecting the cellular and molecular regulators of normal and pathological repair, especially given the availability of transgenic tools and cell-sorting methods. However, the most common back-punch excisional model heals predominantly by panniculus carnosus-mediated contraction (up to 90%), which limits granulation tissue formation and affects reepithelialization. The mouse tail excisional model provides an alternative to back-punch model as wound closure yielding robust granulation and epithelial coverage due to the "splinting" effect of the tail structure. Here, we describe a detailed, reproducible protocol for tail excisional wounds optimized for histology, cryosectioning, and downstream cell isolation for single-cell multi-omic analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42149457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.