Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42149442›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Imaging Approach to DNA Damage Induction and Quantification.

Mikael V Garabedian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mikael V GarabedianRobert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. mg2363@rutgers.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7826-7491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunofluorescence-based imaging can offer high signal-to-noise and overall superior image quality of fixed cells over that of live-cell imaging. This is especially true of tracking and quantifying DNA damage sites as there is a dearth of reliable or easy-to-use methods in living cells. Here, I describe a useful workflow for DNA damage induction in cell culture, fixation, staining, and method for analyzing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Further, I provide troubleshooting tips for common issues while performing image segmentation and analysis.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageFluorescent Antibody TechniqueAnimalsHistonesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, FluorescenceStaining and LabelingHistonesAntibodiesDNA damage fociDouble strand breaks (DSBs)Image segmentationImmunofluorescenceγH2AX

Identifiers

PMID42149442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.