ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Binding and retrieval of omitted responses in complex response sequences.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The sound of silence: Binding and retrieval of silence in distractor-response binding.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human action control relies on the close interconnection of action and perception. This is possible through a binding mechanism that integrates distributed features of perceptual and action-related events within sensorimotor representations (event files). Encountering any one of these features later on can retrieve previously integrated features from memory and influence current action. Since actions are represented as their sensory consequences rather than their motor pattern, previous studies suggest that actions can be integrated into and retrieved from event representations even without being executed. However, it is still unclear whether binding and retrieval processes for omitted actions are highly automatic processes or if they can be influenced by higher-order strategies. Here we used sequential tasks to investigate whether binding and retrieval regarding omitted responses is affected by the time to prepare a response and by the likelihood of response omissions. Results indicate that binding and retrieval are highly adaptive processes that rely on the action planning of responses but operate beyond immediate action contingencies, facilitating efficient action control in future behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.