Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42149427›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

Binding and retrieval of omitted responses in complex response sequences.

Maria Nemeth, Klaus Rothermund, Christian Frings, Birte Moeller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria NemethDepartment of Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Trier University, Trier, Germany. nemeth@uni-trier.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2424-5320
Klaus RothermundDepartment of Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany.
Christian FringsDepartment of Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Trier University, Trier, Germany.
Birte MoellerDepartment of Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Trier University, Trier, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FOR 2790Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft MO 2839/4-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human action control relies on the close interconnection of action and perception. This is possible through a binding mechanism that integrates distributed features of perceptual and action-related events within sensorimotor representations (event files). Encountering any one of these features later on can retrieve previously integrated features from memory and influence current action. Since actions are represented as their sensory consequences rather than their motor pattern, previous studies suggest that actions can be integrated into and retrieved from event representations even without being executed. However, it is still unclear whether binding and retrieval processes for omitted actions are highly automatic processes or if they can be influenced by higher-order strategies. Here we used sequential tasks to investigate whether binding and retrieval regarding omitted responses is affected by the time to prepare a response and by the likelihood of response omissions. Results indicate that binding and retrieval are highly adaptive processes that rely on the action planning of responses but operate beyond immediate action contingencies, facilitating efficient action control in future behavior.

Indexed as

AttentionMental RecallPattern Recognition, VisualPsychomotor PerformanceFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeAction planningActionsBindingIdeomotor principleRetrieval

Identifiers

PMID42149427
PMCPMC13183720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.