Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42149425›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026

Influence of Cycloplegia on Axial Length Prediction Models in a Paediatric Sample.

Ivo Soares, António Baptista, Oscar Torrado, Pedro Serra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ivo SoaresDepartment of Physics, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal. isoares@ubi.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6712-7514
António BaptistaPhysics Centre of Minho and Porto Universities (CF-UM-UP), Braga, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7304-8756
Oscar TorradoOphthalmology Clinic Vista Sánchez Trancón, Badajoz, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5808-7602
Pedro SerraOphthalmology Clinic Vista Sánchez Trancón, Badajoz, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0471-0213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical relevanceAccurate axial length (AL) estimation is vital for monitoring myopia progression in children, especially in primary care where optical biometers are often unavailable. Prediction models with cycloplegic measurements may offer a reliable alternative. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of cycloplegia on the accuracy and repeatability of several AL prediction models in a paediatric sample and to identify which models maintain minimal bias under both cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic conditions.

methodsNinety-six children (mean age 12.5 ± 2.4 years) underwent repeated measurements of spherical equivalent refraction (SER), anterior corneal curvature (K

resultsCycloplegia induced a hyperopic shift (mean +0.79 D), most pronounced in emmetropic and hyperopic eyes. Measured AL and all models showed improved repeatability post-cycloplegia (measured AL CoR decreased from ~0.14 mm to ~0.09 mm; ICC > 0.99). Pre-cycloplegia, models overestimated AL (mean differences from -0.87 to -0.24 mm); these biases were reduced post-cycloplegia (mean differences from -0.56 to +0.10 mm). Models by Morgan et al., Queirós et al. and Lingham had the smallest bias (<0.10 mm) and narrowest LoA (<0.84 mm). Variation in SER accounted for ~97-99% of the change in predicted AL, while the K

conclusionCycloplegic refraction significantly enhanced both accuracy and repeatability of AL prediction models in children. Models by Morgan et al., Queirós et al. and Lingham et al. performed best. Predictive models may be a valuable substitute in settings without access to optical biometers, provided cycloplegic measurements are used when possible.

Indexed as

Axial Length, EyeMydriaticsMyopiaRefraction, OcularAdolescentBiometryChildFemaleHumansMalePrediction AlgorithmsPrediction Methods, MachineReproducibility of ResultsMydriaticsAxial lengthCycloplegiaMyopiaPaediatricPrediction modelsRefractive error

Identifiers

PMID42149425
PMCPMC13369017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.