Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42149405›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2026

"They Really Save Us From Ourselves" : Autism Researchers' Insights on Community Engagement and Ethics.

Chloe Silverman, Michael Yudell, Amy Carroll-Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chloe SilvermanDepartment of Politics and Center for Science, Technology, & Society, College of Arts and Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. cbs78@drexel.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5062-6656
Michael YudellCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Amy Carroll-ScottDepartment of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Funding

Division of Social and Economic Sciences 1737149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism research depends on the participation of autistic children and adults as well as their families, but researchers have not routinely involved autistic people in the planning or execution of research. Community-engaged research practices, standard in other fields such as areas of public health, are gaining acceptance in autism research, although some researchers and other stakeholders remain concerned about their appropriateness, feasibility, or utility. This study, part of a larger project on stakeholder views on the ethics of community engagement practices in autism research, examines researchers' ethical beliefs about community engagement. We find that the researchers with whom we spoke cite multiple specific ethical and epistemological benefits of these practices and relatively few risks. Barriers to community engagement are, in their view, often institutional and practical, including the longer timelines of community-engaged research, resistance or lack of comprehension on the part of funding organizations and grant reviewers, the need for additional resources to support appropriate compensation, and ensuring that community stakeholders and researchers have a shared understanding of terminology.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity ParticipationEthics, ResearchResearch PersonnelChildHumansAutismCommunity engagementDisabilityRepresentationResearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID42149405
PMCPMC13645854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.