Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42149384›Full record

ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2026

Immediate dentin sealing: current concepts, clinical workflow, and evidence-based applications.

Hamad Algamaiah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Immediate dentin sealing - A resurrection.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hamad AlgamaiahDepartment of Restorative Dental Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. haljamaiah@ksu.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immediate Dentin Sealing (IDS) has become an essential clinical protocol aimed at optimizing adhesive bonding in indirect restorations due to increasing demands for durable restorations, reduced postoperative complications, and improved patient satisfaction in restorative dentistry. This comprehensive review systematically examines the underlying principles, varied application techniques, and clinical implications associated with IDS. This narrative review was conducted by searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for relevant in vitro and clinical studies, using the search terms: immediate dentin sealing, IDS, dentin bonding, indirect restorations, and adhesive dentistry. Current evidence from both in vitro and clinical studies is thoroughly reviewed, emphasizing the superior bond strength, enhanced long-term bond durability, reduced dentin permeability, and decreased postoperative sensitivity achieved with IDS compared to delayed dentin sealing. Various adhesive strategies, including etch-and-rinse and self-etch systems, as well as adjunctive methods such as the application of flowable resin liners, are critically evaluated. Clinical investigations consistently report favorable outcomes concerning patient comfort, restoration longevity, and structural integrity when IDS protocols are employed. The evidence suggests that IDS may offer meaningful clinical advantages, supporting its consideration as a reliable and promising approach in contemporary restorative dentistry; however, the evidence should be interpreted in light of existing methodological limitations, and further long-term clinical studies are warranted.

Indexed as

Adhesive systemBonded restorationDirect restorationIDSImmediate dentin sealingIndirect restorationResin compositesRestorative dentistry

Identifiers

PMID42149384
PMCPMC13184010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.