ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2026
Immediate dentin sealing: current concepts, clinical workflow, and evidence-based applications.
Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immediate dentin sealing - A resurrection.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immediate Dentin Sealing (IDS) has become an essential clinical protocol aimed at optimizing adhesive bonding in indirect restorations due to increasing demands for durable restorations, reduced postoperative complications, and improved patient satisfaction in restorative dentistry. This comprehensive review systematically examines the underlying principles, varied application techniques, and clinical implications associated with IDS. This narrative review was conducted by searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for relevant in vitro and clinical studies, using the search terms: immediate dentin sealing, IDS, dentin bonding, indirect restorations, and adhesive dentistry. Current evidence from both in vitro and clinical studies is thoroughly reviewed, emphasizing the superior bond strength, enhanced long-term bond durability, reduced dentin permeability, and decreased postoperative sensitivity achieved with IDS compared to delayed dentin sealing. Various adhesive strategies, including etch-and-rinse and self-etch systems, as well as adjunctive methods such as the application of flowable resin liners, are critically evaluated. Clinical investigations consistently report favorable outcomes concerning patient comfort, restoration longevity, and structural integrity when IDS protocols are employed. The evidence suggests that IDS may offer meaningful clinical advantages, supporting its consideration as a reliable and promising approach in contemporary restorative dentistry; however, the evidence should be interpreted in light of existing methodological limitations, and further long-term clinical studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.