ArticleJournal of medical systems2026
Motion-Based Confidence Score to Support the Practical Application of rPPG Methods in Health Monitoring.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) has gained popularity as a non-invasive technique for remote monitoring, as it can provide accurate measurements of an individual's physiological signals under controlled conditions. However, the accuracy of rPPG can be affected by various factors, such as movement artifacts, changes in skin tone, and the presence of other sources of light in the environment. To improve the reliability of rPPG measurements in real-world monitoring settings and reduce the frequency of false alarms in health monitoring settings, we propose a confidence score indicating the quality of the predictions. This score was built by identifying meaningful variables related to motion that strongly correlate with the accuracy of the measurements and training a classifier with data coming from 3 distinct datasets, to improve the model's robustness, reproducibility, and generalizability. Despite that only motion-related features have been considered, the high AUC values obtained in all cases were always above 0.93, demonstrating the model's ability to detect inaccurate heart rate measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.