ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Protein-protein interaction disruption as a next-generation antithrombotic strategy.
Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thrombosis: focus on molecular mechanisms, biomarkers and cardio-oncology.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thrombosis is built, not merely catalyzed. Across arterial and venous disease, thrombus formation depends on a succession of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) that coordinate platelet capture and activation, thromboinflammatory amplification, and assembly of membrane-bound coagulation complexes. Although active-site inhibitors and receptor antagonists have transformed antithrombotic therapy, clinical benefit is often constrained by bleeding because many targets are indispensable for everyday hemostasis when inhibited systemically. This review advances a "thrombus assembly" framework that reframes drug discovery around disrupting interfaces that organize pathologic clot growth in a context-dependent manner shaped by shear, surfaces, local cofactors, and transient complex formation. We highlight translational proof that interface blockade works in humans, focusing on VWF A1-GPIbα inhibition and GPVI-directed strategies as exemplars of lesion- and shear-dependent antiplatelet therapy. We then survey platelet adhesion and activation PPIs (VWF-GPIb, collagen-GPVI, and αIIbβ3-ligand interactions), thromboinflammatory interfaces (including P-selectin-PSGL-1 and CLEC-2-podoplanin), and opportunities to target coagulation complex assembly and thrombin exosites without directly inhibiting catalytic active sites. A modality-focused section links interface class to therapeutic format-antibodies/nanobodies, aptamers with antidotes, peptides and macrocycles, and small-molecule PPI inhibitors-and summarizes trade-offs in reversibility, half-life, manufacturability, and immunogenicity. Finally, we discuss assays that preserve interface biology (whole-blood flow systems, microfluidics, thrombin generation, and clot mechanics) and propose clinical positioning and trial endpoints for context-gated mechanisms. By targeting the contacts that assemble and stabilize thrombi, PPI disruption offers a pragmatic route toward more selective, potentially bleeding-sparing antithrombotic therapy and a roadmap for next-generation pipeline development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42149311What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.