ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Prediction of venous thromboembolism after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage based on machine learning.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Current risk assessment tools are limited and not tailored for neurocritical care populations. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning-based models to predict VTE in ICH patients. Clinical data of 872 ICH patients admitted to the Neurosurgical ICU of Huashan Hospital from June 2018 to July 2023 were analysed. After univariate analysis, feature selection was performed using Random Forest Importance Ranking and LASSO regression. Three machine learning models (random forest, logistic regression, and LASSO logistic regression) were trained using 10-fold cross-validation. The dataset was randomly split into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, AUC, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Among 421 patients included in the final analysis, 215 (51.1%) developed VTE. Five independent predictors (BMI, D-dimer, homocysteine, triglycerides, albumin) were identified. All three models showed strong discriminatory performance, with the random forest model achieving the highest AUC (0.98) and PR-AUC (0.98), followed by logistic regression (AUC 0.94, PR-AUC 0.91) and LASSO-LR (AUC 0.93, PR-AUC 0.91). Machine learning-based models incorporating metabolic and clinical predictors can accurately stratify VTE risk in ICH patients. The random forest model demonstrated superior performance and clinical applicability, highlighting potential for guiding early prophylactic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42149307What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.