ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2026
Risk stratification of preterm birth using the uterocervical angle and its rate of change in mid- and late-pregnancy: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMid-pregnancy cervical length (CL) has limited predictive performance for spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) in the normal range. The uterocervical angle (UCA) is a promising marker, but evidence regarding late-pregnancy UCA and its longitudinal change is limited. We evaluated UCA in mid- and late-pregnancy and the % change (ΔUCA) as predictors of sPTB, and developed a pragmatic risk-stratification scheme using these parameters.
methodsIn a single-center retrospective study, 163 singleton pregnancies were analyzed. UCA was measured on transvaginal ultrasound at 16-24 weeks (mid-pregnancy) and 25-33 weeks (late-pregnancy). ΔUCA was calculated as the % change from mid to late-pregnancy. Predictive performance for sPTB (< 37 weeks) was assessed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis.
resultsA mid-pregnancy UCA ≥ 105° had a sensitivity of 85.4%, specificity of 76.9%, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.858 (95% CI 0.768-0.948) for prediction of sPTB. In contrast, CL < 25 mm had a sensitivity of 8.3% (mid-pregnancy) and 17.9% (late-pregnancy). A late-pregnancy UCA ≥ 112° had a sensitivity of 81.8%, specificity of 56.7%, and AUC of 0.728 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.623-0.833), and ΔUCA ≥ + 12% predicted sPTB with a sensitivity of 81.2%, specificity of 66.7%, and AUC of 0.742 (95% CI 0.579-0.905). Using three criteria (mid-pregnancy UCA ≥ 105°, late-pregnancy UCA ≥ 112°, ΔUCA ≥ + 12%), preterm birth rates were 1.4% (low-risk: 0 points) vs. 46.2% (high-risk: 3 points) (p < 0.001).
conclusionsUCA in mid- and late-pregnancy and ΔUCA predict sPTB with higher sensitivity than CL shortening alone, offering a noninvasive complement to current screening. In particular, a mid-pregnancy UCA ≥ 105° and ΔUCA ≥ + 12% may identify clinically important high-risk cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42149291What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.