ArticleDiscover oncology2026
Predicting of survival in metastatic melanoma patients under anti-PD-1 monotherapy using genomic mutation and copy number variation.
Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough PD-1 inhibitors have significantly reduced metastatic melanoma patients' mortality, only a small proportion of these patients actually benefit. We aim to develop some parsimonious predictive models for identifying those patients' survival outcome under anti-PD-1 treatment.
methodBased on the genomic mutation and copy number variation data of metastatic melanoma patients in the Liu and Shoushtari cohorts, we developed and validated three different nomograms to identify their survival outcomes under anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Patients without anti-PD-1 monotherapy in the TCGA and MSK cohorts were employed as negative controls to assess the applicability of our models to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. All predictive models developed in this study are accessible and available for use at https://yyw0505.shinyapps.io/nomogram_app/ .
resultThe first nomogram, and also the one we most recommend, built on five genes including NID1 amplification, TYRP1 deletion, mutations of PIK3C2G, FLT1 and IKZF1, classified patients into the High-Risk and Low-Risk group, and patients in the High-Risk group exhibited shorter overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). However, there was no difference of OS between the two groups in both the TCGA and MSK cohorts, indicated the first nomogram was a predictive model rather than prognostic model. Similar results were also observed in the second and third nomogram.
conclusionThe parsimonious and robust predictive model could provide valuable assistance for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.