Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42149226›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026

Seeing the positive in the face of adversity: neurocognitive markers of risk and resilience in emotional conflict processing in children with maltreatment exposure.

Ferdinand Hoffmann, Lea Bentz, Sonja Entringer, Sibylle M Winter, Claudia Buss, Christine Heim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ferdinand HoffmannInstitute of Medical Psychology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Luisenstr. 57, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Lea BentzInstitute of Medical Psychology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Luisenstr. 57, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Sonja EntringerInstitute of Medical Psychology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Luisenstr. 57, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Sibylle M WinterDivision of Clinical-Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Claudia BussInstitute of Medical Psychology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Luisenstr. 57, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Christine HeimInstitute of Medical Psychology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Luisenstr. 57, 10117, Berlin, Germany. christine.heim@charite.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying cognitive-emotional mechanisms that distinguish risk from resilience for developing internalizing disorders after childhood maltreatment is essential for detecting early vulnerability and informing targeted interventions. We examined whether affective control and attentional biases contribute to internalizing symptoms versus resilience in children with maltreatment exposure during middle childhood. We recruited N = 208 children, aged 6-12 years, including N = 84 with maltreatment exposure from child welfare offices and clinics and N = 124 children without maltreatment exposure. An emotional flanker task was used to assess affective control and attentional biases. Associations between these cognitive-emotional mechanisms, internalizing symptoms, and trait resilience were examined. Children with maltreatment exposure showed reduced affective control and heightened attentional processing of distracting angry faces, indicating increased sensitivity to threat-related information. Among children exposed to maltreatment, greater avoidance of threat was associated with more internalizing symptoms. Notably, greater attentional processing of distracting happy faces was linked to higher trait resilience across both groups and moderated the association between maltreatment exposure and internalizing symptoms. These findings suggest that children with maltreatment exposure exhibit early difficulties in affective control and a bias toward negative information processing. Crucially, enhanced attentional engagement with positive stimuli may function as a protective factor, buffering against internalizing symptoms and fostering resilience. Early interventions targeting affective control and the processing of positive social cues may improve mental health outcomes in children exposed to maltreatment.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasChild AbuseConflict, PsychologicalEmotionsResilience, PsychologicalChildFacial ExpressionFemaleHumansMaleAffective controlInternalizing disordersMaltreatmentResilience

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.