SynthesisEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
Systematic review: Efficacy of off-label antipsychotic use in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive, mood dysregulation, depression, anxiety, and sleep-related disorders.
Synthesis in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antipsychotics (APs) are not officially approved for the treatment of depressive, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, emotional dysregulation, or sleep disorders among children and adolescents. Despite this, the treatment of these common and comorbid disorders is likely to partially explain the increased AP use. We assessed all studies reporting changes in symptoms or functioning during antipsychotic treatment for these diagnoses among patients < 18 years old. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EBM reviews and PsycINFO databases for all studies published by October 30, 2025, reporting on the effectiveness of APs for obsessive-compulsive, mood dysregulation, depression, anxiety, and sleep-related disorders among patients < 18 years. We evaluated evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE). Of the 2237 identified studies, 119 were eligible for full-text review, and 13 were included in the final review. One study compared two antipsychotics, while the rest were uncontrolled open-label studies, case series, or case reports. No randomized controlled trials nor studies on sleep or anxiety disorders were identified. While there were reported changes in standardized mean scores between baseline and endpoint, the level of evidence in obsessive-compulsive, mood dysregulation, and depression related disorders was very low. The identified very low level of evidence stands in stark contrast to clinical practice, where APs are increasingly prescribed. Future methodologically robust studies are needed to demonstrate efficacy. Given the side effects of APs, physicians should carefully consider the benefits and harms when prescribing them for off-label indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.