ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
Impact of legislative reform on coercive measure use in child and adolescent psychiatry: A controlled interrupted time series analysis.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence on legislative reforms to reduce coercive measures remains limited. We evaluated short-to-medium-term effects of Sweden's July 2020 stricter legal regulation of coercive measures in youth < 18 years. In a controlled interrupted time-series study, we used 2017-2021 registry and electronic medical record data from inpatient child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in Region Stockholm, Sweden. Controls included Finnish CAMHS and Region Stockholm young adult psychiatric patients (18-24 years). Monthly outcomes were rates of seclusion, mechanical restraint, involuntary medication and a composite measure, mean durations, and sedative medication use. Segmented regression estimated level- and trend changes, adjusting for pre-intervention trends. Among 7,075 admissions (3,840 individuals) to Stockholm inpatient CAMHS, involuntary medication increased immediately in minors relative to young adults (incidence rate ratio 2.49, 95% CI 1.63-3.81), with no other changes in patient-day-standardised models. Comparisons with Finnish CAHMS provided no consistent evidence of reduced coercion. Mean durations also increased in minors versus young adults (12% for seclusion; 6% for mechanical restraint), while sedative medication use remained stable. Findings were robust in sensitivity analyses. Contrary to the reform's aims, stricter legislation alone was not associated with reduced coercive measure use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42149224What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.