ArticleActa neurochirurgica2026
Cerebrospinal fluid shunt outcomes in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and an Evans index below 0.3: a prospective study.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn Evans index greater than 0.3 is a key diagnostic criterion for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). However, some patients with iNPH symptoms and an Evans index below 0.3 achieve favorable outcomes after cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic characteristics and CSF shunt outcomes of these patients.
methodsThis prospective study enrolled patients presenting with iNPH symptoms and an Evans index below 0.3. Patients who showed clinical improvement after a spinal tap test underwent CSF shunt placement via ventriculoperitoneal or lumboperitoneal shunting. Outcomes were assessed using subjective tools and symptom-specific scores at baseline and at 3 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery.
resultsThirty-five patients with a mean (SD) Evans index of 0.26 (0.02) underwent CSF shunt placement. All clinical domains showed statistically significant improvement at 6 months compared with baseline, except cognition. Subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in preoperative and final postoperative iNPH grading scale scores between patients undergoing ventriculoperitoneal and lumboperitoneal shunting. One patient experienced shunt overdrainage causing bilateral chronic subdural hematoma that required burr hole craniostomy.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that patients with iNPH-like symptoms and an Evans index below 0.3 can benefit from CSF shunt surgery. Multiple assessment tools demonstrated substantial postoperative improvement in this group. In patients with typical iNPH symptoms, a positive spinal tap response, and supportive imaging findings, an iNPH diagnosis is justified regardless of ventricular size. Such patients may be considered surgical candidates for CSF shunt placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42149223What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.