ReviewSkeletal radiology2026
Metatarsal tumors: a comprehensive statistical overview and clinical analysis of the largest reported cohort.
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An osteoid osteoma coexisting with a ganglion cyst in the fifth metatarsal head: A rare case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metatarsal tumours are rare lesions that often present diagnostic challenges because of their uncommon anatomical location and broad differential diagnosis. Existing literature has largely been limited to isolated case reports or small case series. This study represents the largest dedicated series of metatarsal tumours reported to date and aims to characterise their epidemiological patterns, demographic features, and diagnostic distribution to support age-based clinical differentiation. A retrospective analysis was performed of 93 metatarsal pathologies. Patient demographics, including age and sex, and final diagnoses classified according to the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) classification were analysed. To enhance clinical applicability, lesions were stratified using an age threshold of 40 years based on pathophysiological relevance. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. The cohort comprised 50 females (53.8%) and 43 males (46.2%), with a mean age of 34.6 years. The most common diagnoses were osteoid osteoma (10.8%), aneurysmal bone cyst (7.5%), osteomyelitis (7.5%), giant cell tumour (7.5%), and non-tumour lesions (7.5%). Distinct demographic trends were observed, including male predominance in osteoid osteoma (80%) and female predominance in giant cell tumour (71%). Age-related diagnostic clustering was also identified, supporting the clinical relevance of age stratification in narrowing differential diagnoses. Although uncommon, metatarsal tumours demonstrate recognisable epidemiological and demographic patterns that may aid diagnostic evaluation. Incorporating patient age alongside clinical, radiological, and histopathological assessment may improve diagnostic accuracy and guide more efficient multidisciplinary management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42149219What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.