Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42149219›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2026

Metatarsal tumors: a comprehensive statistical overview and clinical analysis of the largest reported cohort.

Shashank Chapala, Jonathan Gibson, Vivek Kiyawat, Neha Nischal, Praveen Chinniah, Rajesh Botchu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shashank ChapalaDepartment of Radiology, AIG Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
Jonathan GibsonCollege of Medicine and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Vivek KiyawatDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke on Trent, UK.
Neha NischalDepartment of Radiology, Holy Family Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Praveen ChinniahDepartment of Radiology, Sunnybrook Health Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Rajesh BotchuDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Road South, Northfield, Birmingham, UK. drrajeshb@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7998-2980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metatarsal tumours are rare lesions that often present diagnostic challenges because of their uncommon anatomical location and broad differential diagnosis. Existing literature has largely been limited to isolated case reports or small case series. This study represents the largest dedicated series of metatarsal tumours reported to date and aims to characterise their epidemiological patterns, demographic features, and diagnostic distribution to support age-based clinical differentiation. A retrospective analysis was performed of 93 metatarsal pathologies. Patient demographics, including age and sex, and final diagnoses classified according to the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) classification were analysed. To enhance clinical applicability, lesions were stratified using an age threshold of 40 years based on pathophysiological relevance. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. The cohort comprised 50 females (53.8%) and 43 males (46.2%), with a mean age of 34.6 years. The most common diagnoses were osteoid osteoma (10.8%), aneurysmal bone cyst (7.5%), osteomyelitis (7.5%), giant cell tumour (7.5%), and non-tumour lesions (7.5%). Distinct demographic trends were observed, including male predominance in osteoid osteoma (80%) and female predominance in giant cell tumour (71%). Age-related diagnostic clustering was also identified, supporting the clinical relevance of age stratification in narrowing differential diagnoses. Although uncommon, metatarsal tumours demonstrate recognisable epidemiological and demographic patterns that may aid diagnostic evaluation. Incorporating patient age alongside clinical, radiological, and histopathological assessment may improve diagnostic accuracy and guide more efficient multidisciplinary management.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsMetatarsal BonesAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBone cysts, aneurysmalBone neoplasmsDiagnosis, differentialFoot diseasesFractures, stressGiant cell tumor of boneMetatarsal bonesOsteoma, osteoidRetrospective studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.