ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Accidental arterial PICC placement in neonatal patients: a case series.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a paucity of literature relating to accidental arterial peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement in neonatal patients. We present a series of nine cases from a single centre. A database of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) assessments of PICC lines was recorded at a single tertiary neonatal intensive care unit over a 5-year period (2020-25). This database was reviewed and cases of arterial PICC line placement were identified. Of 265 POCUS assessments, intra-arterial PICC placement was identified in 3% (n = 9). High-risk insertion sites include the area posterior to the medial malleolus (n = 3, 33%) and the median cubital fossa (n = 3, 33%). A third of cases (n = 3, 33%) developed no complications. Complications included oozing from the site (n = 3, 33%), high pressure on infusion pumps (n = 2, 22%) and digital ischaemia (n = 3, 33%). All cases of ischemia occurred in lower limb PICCs and the majority (n = 2, 66%) in the contralateral limb to the insertion site, leading to a delay in identification of the arterial placement by 5 to 17 days.
conclusionThis series supports the use of routine immediate POCUS for all neonatal PICC lines and consideration of real-time ultrasound-guided PICC placement. Warning signs of intra-arterial placement include abnormal line trajectory on radiographs, insertion site oozing, high pump pressures and limb ischaemia (including contralateral limb involvement). Particularly high-risk neonates include those with congenital diaphragmatic hernia whereby mediastinal shift renders radiographic confirmation of PICC position unreliable. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Neonatal PICC position is usually confirmed by radiography, and accidental arterial cannulation (AAC) is considered rare. WHAT IS NEW: • AAC occurred more frequently than previously reported and was often not detected clinically or on radiographs. • Point-of-care ultrasound improved identification of AAC and may improve neonatal PICC safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42149194What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.