ReviewRecent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer2026
Optical and Photoacoustic Imaging.
Review in Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical imaging is crucial in preclinical evaluation of tumor development, progression, and therapies, due to its low cost, versatility, sensitivity, and capability of real-time monitoring. The main in vivo imaging techniques include fluorescence, bioluminescence, and photoacoustic imaging. Although all three applications are limited by relatively low tissue penetration due to absorption and scattering of light in biological tissues, each application has its own benefits. Fluorescence imaging is technically the simplest method to perform and using near infrared fluorescent (NIRF) probes can enhance depth capability. Moreover, novel activatable probes, lifetime imaging, and multimodal imaging strategies have extended its utility to endoscopic and surgical procedures. Bioluminescence imaging boasts high sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio, as light emission originates at the target from enzymatic reactions. However, it requires genetic modification to express luciferases, restricting its use in humans. Photoacoustic imaging offers better depth penetration compared to purely optical methods by utilizing ultrasound signals. Leveraging endogenous contrast from chromophores, it assists in vascular imaging and tumor identification without external labels. Due to the use of safe, non-ionizing radiation, it reduces the risk to subjects and allows repeated imaging, and is thus most suited for clinical translation. All three applications continuously benefit from the development of three-dimensional imaging techniques and deep learning algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42149189What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.