ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2026
Biokinetic modelling of the exhalation of
Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The radiopharmaceutical 223Ra-dichloride (Xofigo®) has been approved for palliative treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. During the treatment and caregiving, patients who received 223Ra-dichloride can exhale the progeny 219Rn, a radioactive gas. This causes a potential risk for medical staff and caregivers who might inhale the 219Rn gas and its airborne decay products. As an addition to the strategies of developing devices for measuring 219Rn gas and its daughter nuclides in treatment rooms, this work tried to estimate the amount of exhaled 219Rn and of its airborne progeny using biokinetic modelling. The biokinetic models and parameters for 223Ra and its progeny 219Rn, as published by the International Commission of Radiological Protection, were adopted for this analysis. Without consideration of room ventilation, the model predicted that the amount of 219Rn gas in the room air can reach a maximum activity of 5.8∙10− 2 Bq at approximately 1.5 min after infusion of one Bq of 223RaCl2. The summed activities of 219Rn and its airborne progeny do not exceed 1.2∙10− 1 Bq per infused Bq of 223RaCl2. In the breathing air of the patients, the activities at 1 and 5 min after the infusion were estimated to be approximately 2∙10− 2 Bq and 1.8∙10− 2 Bq per Bq of 223RaCl2, respectively. The values at 1 min are comparable to the measured results reported in the literature. The effective dose from inhalation of 219Rn gas and its airborne progeny due to a treatment of 4015 kBq of 223RaCl2, was estimated to be 232.6 nSv for medical staff and 7.5 µSv for caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.