Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42149170›Full record

ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2026

Biokinetic modelling of the exhalation of

Lena Katzdobler, Astrid Delker, Augusto Giussani, Kerstin Hürkamp, Christina Kuttler, Oliver Meisenberg, Sibylle Ziegler, Wei Bo Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lena KatzdoblerDepartment of Medical and Occupational Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Germany. lkatzdobler@bfs.de.ORCID 0009-0003-3756-9508
Astrid DelkerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Augusto GiussaniDepartment of Medical and Occupational Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Kerstin HürkampDepartment of Environmental Radioactivity, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Christina KuttlerDepartment of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Oliver MeisenbergDepartment of Medical and Occupational Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Sibylle ZieglerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Wei Bo LiDepartment of Medical and Occupational Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Germany. wli@bfs.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9802-4400

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The radiopharmaceutical 223Ra-dichloride (Xofigo®) has been approved for palliative treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. During the treatment and caregiving, patients who received 223Ra-dichloride can exhale the progeny 219Rn, a radioactive gas. This causes a potential risk for medical staff and caregivers who might inhale the 219Rn gas and its airborne decay products. As an addition to the strategies of developing devices for measuring 219Rn gas and its daughter nuclides in treatment rooms, this work tried to estimate the amount of exhaled 219Rn and of its airborne progeny using biokinetic modelling. The biokinetic models and parameters for 223Ra and its progeny 219Rn, as published by the International Commission of Radiological Protection, were adopted for this analysis. Without consideration of room ventilation, the model predicted that the amount of 219Rn gas in the room air can reach a maximum activity of 5.8∙10− 2 Bq at approximately 1.5 min after infusion of one Bq of 223RaCl2. The summed activities of 219Rn and its airborne progeny do not exceed 1.2∙10− 1 Bq per infused Bq of 223RaCl2. In the breathing air of the patients, the activities at 1 and 5 min after the infusion were estimated to be approximately 2∙10− 2 Bq and 1.8∙10− 2 Bq per Bq of 223RaCl2, respectively. The values at 1 min are comparable to the measured results reported in the literature. The effective dose from inhalation of 219Rn gas and its airborne progeny due to a treatment of 4015 kBq of 223RaCl2, was estimated to be 232.6 nSv for medical staff and 7.5 µSv for caregivers.

Indexed as

Air Pollutants, RadioactiveCaregiversModels, BiologicalRadiumExhalationHumansKineticsMaleRadiation DosageRadioisotopesRadonAir Pollutants, RadioactiveRadioisotopesRadiumradium Ra 223 dichlorideRadon219Rn223RaCl2Alpha-particle emittersBiokinetic modellingEffective doseExhalationmCRPCRadionuclide therapy

Identifiers

PMID42149170
PMCPMC13303660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.