Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42149155›Full record

ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2026

[Future prospects for young ophthalmologists in Germany : Results of a nationwide survey conducted by the Professional Association of German Ophthalmologists (BVA)].

Marian Kiel, Inger Lüdeke, Sebastian Siebelmann, Philipp Bachmann

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marian KielAugenklinik und Poliklinik der Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. marian.kiel@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7841-804X
Inger Lüdeke
Sebastian Siebelmann
Philipp Bachmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe career aspirations of young ophthalmologists are undergoing change. In addition to the traditional self-employment in private practice, new working models, such as salaried employment in a medical care center (MVZ), are becoming increasingly more important.

objectiveThe aim of the study was to gain insights into the career planning, job satisfaction and professional policy expectations of young ophthalmologists. MATERIAL AND

methodsData collection took place between 16 December 2024 and 1 March 2025, using a standardized anonymous online questionnaire. The target group was doctors in ophthalmology training and ophthalmology specialists in the first 3 years after the training period.

resultsIn this study 236 people took part, 53 % were in specialist training, 24 % were employed as medical specialists, 43 % preferred self-employment in a group practice, 25 % preferred employment in a medical care center and 19 % cited private practice as their preferred model. Decisive factors for setting up a practice are better organizational conditions, such as the removal of bureaucratic hurdles (62 %) and the reduction of financial risks, for example through recourse (56 %). Of those surveyed, 70 % would like to see practical training from the Professional Association of German Ophthalmologists (BVA), 42 % would like mentoring and 40 % would like networking opportunities with other colleagues.

conclusionThe results of our nationwide survey show that good working conditions and training opportunities are key concerns for young ophthalmologists. The preference of many respondents for self-employment underscores the need to reduce structural barriers to setting up a private practice.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceOphthalmologistsOphthalmologySocieties, MedicalAdultEmploymentFemaleForecastingGermanyHumansJob SatisfactionMalePrivate PracticeSurveys and QuestionnairesContinuing educationNext generation promotionOphthalmologyPrivate practiceProfessional policy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.