Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42148885›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026

Contactless Acoustic Trapping of Hoverflies for Behavioral Studies.

Thomas Gaillard, Victor Contreras, Dominique Martinez, Stéphane Viollet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas GaillardAix Marseille Université, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France.
Victor ContrerasUniversidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Ciencias Fisicas, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Dominique MartinezAix Marseille Université, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France.
Stéphane ViolletAix Marseille Université, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France.

Funding

Aix Marseille Université and Defence Innovation Agency (DIA)CNRS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying the sensorimotor response of flying insects is usually done in tethered conditions. The righting reflex, for example, is studied with insects that are released either from a rigid or a magnetic tether. The attached tether or magnet may, however, induce proprioceptive biases and behavioral artifacts through physical contact and additional mass or inertia. Here, we propose a contactless tether apparatus based on acoustic levitation. It relies on the emission of ultrasonic waves on both sides of the device, creating standing pressure waves-visualized using the schlieren technique-that enable insect levitation. We demonstrate its effectiveness on living hoverflies Episyrphus balteatus. By quantifying the rate of motion of four natural body markers (head, abdomen, wing, and leg) and the wingbeat response, we show that hoverfly levitation can be stable for a long period of time, with minimal behavioral perturbation under ultrasound stimulation. We further illustrate the application of ultrasound tethering to study the hoverfly righting reflex. Beyond hoverflies, ultrasound tethering was applied successfully to levitate other insect species, such as dead Drosophila and ants. More broadly, ultrasound tethering might be relevant in the context of behavioral studies with flying or walking insects.

Indexed as

AcousticsBehavior, AnimalDipteraFlight, AnimalAnimalsReflex, Rightingacoustic tetheringbehaviorflyfree‐fallinsectlevitationverticality perception

Identifiers

PMID42148885
PMCPMC13182685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.