Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42148784›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026

Age-related long-term effects of vaginal delivery, pregnancy, and sphincter injury on anal continence: A matched cohort study.

Ida E K Nilsson, Jwan Al-Mukhtar Othman, Jennie Larsudd-Kåverud, Sigvard Åkervall, Mattias Molin, Ian Milsom, Maria Gyhagen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ida E K NilssonGothenburg Continence Research Centre, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jwan Al-Mukhtar OthmanGothenburg Continence Research Centre, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jennie Larsudd-KåverudGothenburg Continence Research Centre, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5050-0343
Sigvard ÅkervallGothenburg Continence Research Centre, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mattias MolinStatistical Consultancy Group, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6171-9182
Ian MilsomGothenburg Continence Research Centre, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0400-5509
Maria GyhagenGothenburg Continence Research Centre, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7355-8644

Funding

Stiftelsen Handlanden Hjalmar Svenssons HJSV2022018Västra Götalandsregionen ALFGBG-933810Västra Götalandsregionen ALFGBG-966115Västra Götalandsregionen VGFOUREG-967583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt is still poorly understood to what extent various obstetric and non-obstetric factors contribute to anal incontinence in women from a lifetime perspective. This study aimed to assess the contribution of pregnancy, delivery mode, obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), and age on anal incontinence in women aged 40-64 years. MATERIAL AND

methodsData from the Swedish Medical Birth Register and the Total Population Register were linked to responses to an anal incontinence questionnaire collected in 2014 and 2015. The study included 13 480 women, 20 years from first birth, with BMI data: 4192 nulliparas, 2411 with two cesarean deliveries, and 6877 with two vaginal deliveries. Women were matched by exact age and BMI (±3 units), yielding three cohorts of 1961 women each. A subgroup analysis compared vaginally delivered women without OASI to those with one or two OASIs.

resultsThe prevalence of fecal incontinence was highest in women with 2 vaginal deliveries (14.2%) and lowest in those with 2 cesarean deliveries (10.2%, p < 0.001). Fecal incontinence was significantly higher in nulliparous women (12.9%) compared with the cesarean group (p < 0.01). Both bothersome fecal (p = 0.001) and anal (p < 0.001) incontinence were more common following vaginal delivery compared to cesarean delivery. Among women with 2 vaginal deliveries, the prevalence of fecal incontinence nearly doubled in those with OASI compared to those without (23.3% vs. 13.7%, p < 0.01). Women with OASI reported a greater symptom burden, demonstrated by a higher Jorge-Wexner score (2.38 vs. 1.42, p < 0.001), increased use of protective products (7.8% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.025), and a higher reported impact on daily lifestyle (20.7% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.002). Only women with two vaginal deliveries showed a significant age-related increase in fecal incontinence.

conclusionsLong-term fecal incontinence was more common and severe after vaginal delivery, particularly with OASI. An age-related effect on fecal incontinence was observed only among vaginal deliveries. Even with complete prevention of OASI through perineal protection, a significant age-related increase in fecal incontinence between 40 and 62 years would remain, arising solely from the effect of vaginal delivery. Preventing OASI remains an important obstetric target to reduce fecal incontinence later in life.

Indexed as

Anal CanalDelivery, ObstetricFecal IncontinenceAdultAge FactorsCesarean SectionCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyPrevalenceRegistriesRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenanal incontinencecesarean deliveryfecal incontinencenulliparous womenobstetric anal sphincter injuryvaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID42148784
PMCPMC13308980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.