Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42148603›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2026

Deep learning-based cognitive impairment brain imaging analysis: New methods, new technologies, and new paradigms.

Qingqin Xu, Jianwei Lu, Zhongfu Zhang, Dongsheng Xu, Chengxiang Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qingqin XuCollege of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jianwei LuCollege of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhongfu ZhangCollege of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Dongsheng XuCollege of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8477-5377
Chengxiang GuoInformation Technology Center, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.ORCID 0009-0003-1265-7181

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive impairment arising from ischemic stroke, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease presents distinct structural and network-level alterations. Brain magnetic resonance imaging offers a non-invasive and high-resolution approach to assess these changes, while deep learning provides powerful tools for automated analysis. Given that accurate lesion delineation, precise localization of abnormal regions, and reliable disease classification are fundamental to clinical decision-making. This review aims to explore the application of deep learning techniques to brain magnetic resonance imaging analysis of cognitive impairments caused by these disorders, with a focus on three core tasks: lesion segmentation, object detection, and image classification. Recent widely accepted findings indicate that ischemic stroke studies have achieved state-of-the-art lesion segmentation performance, with optimized U-shaped convolutional network (U-Net) and hybrid convolutional neural network-transformer models reaching Dice scores up to 0.911 in delineating focal damage. Alzheimer's disease research has advanced classification and staging accuracy by more than 10% compared with unimodal baselines through three-dimensional convolutional neural network, Transformers, and multimodal fusion, enabling more precise detection of diffuse cortical atrophy. Parkinson's disease imaging, despite lacking overt structural lesions, has leveraged ResNet and Vision Transformer backbones to identify subtle and spatially distributed abnormalities, improving early-stage differentiation. Persistent challenges include the scarcity of large, high-quality annotated datasets, substantial inter-site variability, high annotation costs, and limited interpretability, hindering clinical integration. Addressing these barriers will require advances in federated learning to mitigate data scarcity while preserving privacy, domain adaptation techniques to reduce inter-site variability, automated annotation, and low-resource training strategies to lower labeling costs, and explainable artificial intelligence to improve interpretability, thereby ensuring model robustness, privacy, and transparency. This review highlights emerging methods, innovative technologies, and novel paradigms that are redefining brain imaging analysis in cognitive impairment. Mechanistically, deep learning improves cognitive impairment analysis by integrating hierarchical and multiscale spatial features, modeling long-range functional connectivity disruptions, and fusing structural with functional imaging to better represent network-level pathology. In conclusion, aligning network architectures with disease-specific imaging characteristics and task requirements can greatly enhance the accuracy, robustness, and generalizability of magnetic resonance imaging analyses for cognitive impairment. Future work should focus on multimodal fusion, structure-function coupling, cross-disease evaluations, and embedding artificial intelligence tools into clinical workflows to support early detection, individualized treatment planning, and large-scale clinical adoption.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasecognitive dysfunctiondeep learningimage classificationischemic strokelesion segmentationmagnetic resonance imagingneuroimagingobject detectionParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID42148603
PMCPMC13557641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.