ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026
Multicenter evaluation of a single-device dengue antibody/antigen rapid test for simultaneous detection of NS1, IgM, and IgG.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dengue is a major global health burden in tropical and subtropical regions, where timely diagnosis is crucial for clinical management and outbreak control. Although rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used at the point of care, their performance varies considerably. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the ASSURE Dengue Ab/Ag Rapid Test across three independent settings: Singapore, India, and Bangladesh, using reference enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and Conformité Européenne (CE)-marked RDTs. In Singapore, 430 characterized serum/plasma samples (141 positive and 289 negative) were tested against Panbio ELISAs and compared with the SD Standard Q Dengue Duo. In India, 300 prospective samples were tested against Panbio ELISAs. In Bangladesh, 85 retrospective samples were evaluated against commercial RDTs, ELISAs, and PCR. In Singapore, ASSURE achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity, outperforming SD Standard Q (sensitivity, 46.81%; specificity, 99.31%). In India, perfect concordance with Panbio ELISAs was observed across non-structural protein 1 (NS1), immunoglobulin M (IgM), and immunoglobulin G (IgG). In Bangladesh, NS1 detection was consistently strong (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 88.14%-96.00%, depending on the comparator), while antibody detection showed lower sensitivity (IgM, 45.45%; IgG, 42.50%) but high specificity (91.07%-100%). Overall, the ASSURE Dengue Ab/Ag Rapid Test demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared with CE-marked ELISAs and RDTs, particularly for NS1 antigen detection, and maintained accuracy across multicenter evaluations. These findings support its use as a reliable point-of-care tool for early dengue diagnosis.IMPORTANCEDengue fever is a mosquito-borne viral infection that affects millions annually. Early diagnosis is critical to reduce complications and improve patient outcomes. While rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used, their reliability remains inconsistent. We evaluated the ASSURE Dengue Ab/Ag Rapid Test in Singapore, India, and Bangladesh, comparing it to established laboratory-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and other commercial RDTs. Across studies, the test consistently achieved high accuracy, particularly for non-structural protein 1 antigen detection, which is crucial for identifying acute dengue infection. In contrast, the antibody components (immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G) showed variable sensitivity, highlighting the well-documented weaknesses and challenges that dengue tests currently face, particularly in antibody detection. Taken together, these results demonstrate that ASSURE is a dependable point-of-care test, especially for early-phase dengue diagnosis, and can improve patient management and outbreak response in endemic regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.