Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42148449›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

Exploring the correlates of COVID-19 vaccination inequity: a global analysis using machine learning from a health economic lens.

Moumita Mukherjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Moumita MukherjeeInstitute of International Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced system resilience, caused economic welfare loss, and widened disparities in healthcare access. This study aims to identify the macro-level factors contributing to COVID-19 vaccination inequity by proposing an AI-driven monitoring framework using classical statistical modelling and machine learning (ML) classifiers from a pooled dataset (WHO, World Bank, and our World in Data) covering 195 countries. Methods: Daily vaccination data and national-level indicators were investigated using concentration indices, classical odds ratios across global regions and seven ML classifiers-logistic regression, naïve Bayes, decision tree, random forest, LightGBM, extra trees, and XGBoost-to identify significant predictors of vaccination inequity with higher accuracy. Results and discussion: Findings show vaccine coverage remains pro-rich in Africa, North America, Europe, and Oceania, whereas Southeast Asia depicts pro-poor vaccine uptake. Capacity of health system, availability of hygiene infrastructure, prioritization of people suffering from noncommunicable diseases, and exposure to behavioral risk factors were strongly associated with pro-poor distribution of vaccine access in low-income (LIC) and lower-middle income countries (LMIC) in Asia and Africa and improves over time. Among ML models, random forest and XGBoost achieved the highest performance. As the final best model, random forest (RF) is selected with highest weighted score (98.5%), AUROC (99.9%). XGBoost is the second-best model attained the second highest weighted score (97.9%), AUROC (99.8%), and both attained good 5-fold cross validation standard deviation (0.009 for RF and 0.014 for XGBoost) allowing temporal stratification of folds. Results justify the superiority of ensemble ML models over single learners in predicting inequity in vaccine uptake. This study proves that machine learning outperforms conventional predictive analysis and more suitable for monitoring inequity in COVID-19 vaccination access to inform global health policy towards intelligent pandemic preparedness. Therefore, to reduce regional inequity in vaccine uptake, the regional-structural nonlinearities in LICs and LMICs should be adjusted through accurate and robust integration of artificial intelligence in monitoring systems.

Indexed as

concentration index (CI)COVID-19ensemble learningmachine learningvaccination inequity

Identifiers

PMID42148449
PMCPMC13176247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.