ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
The impact of collaborative care on perceptions of treatment across racial and ethnic groups.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study examined the impact of the Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) on patients' subjective perceptions of clinician communication, treatment timeliness, and overall treatment quality, with a particular focus on whether these effects differ across racial and ethnic groups. Methods: 797 adult participants with opioid use disorder (OUD) co-occurring with major depression and/or PTSD were recruited for the study from 18 rural and urban primary care clinics in New Mexico and California. Following enrollment, patients were randomized to either CoCM or enhanced usual care (EUC). Using linear models, we examined the relationship between treatment condition and patient perceptions of clinician communication, treatment timeliness, and overall treatment quality among a subset of 503 patients with follow-up measures at 6-months. We also examined whether this relationship was moderated by race and ethnicity. Results: We found no evidence for an effect of CoCM compared to EUC on patients' perceptions of clinician communication, treatment timeliness, or overall treatment quality, and no evidence of moderation by patient race or ethnicity. Conclusion: The present results conflict with prior literature suggesting that collaborative care improves patient perceptions of clinical experiences across diverse patient samples. These conflicting findings highlight the need for localized research that considers specific patient populations and social contexts when examining the impacts of collaborative care on subjective patient perceptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.