ArticleJournal of intelligent manufacturing2026
Analysis of the performance of LSTM-DNN models with the consideration of signal complexity in milling processes.
Article in Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper investigates the impacts of signal complexity on the performance of Deep Learning (DL) models in milling processes, with a particular focus on cutting force due to its critical role in system diagnostics and process monitoring. To compare the Cutter-Workpiece-Engagement (CWE) time-dependent and time-independent processes, signal characterisation was firstly conducted using various feature indicators to quantify signal complexity under different conditions. Multiple DL models were then evaluated through controlled cutting trials to assess how variations in signal complexity affect model performance. The signal analysis revealed that the 14 selected indicators, along with the Recurrent Neural Network-Deep Neural Network (RNN-DNN) models, demonstrated monotonicity as the number of embedded 'active frequencies' increased during the "Partial Engagement" or CWE time-dependent process. However, as the depth of the DL models increased, this monotonicity effect diminished. Furthermore, clearer dependencies were observed in the analysis of harmonic prediction performance, particularly with a more pronounced impact on accuracy and uncertainty in the 'Partial Engagement' stage compared to the 'Full Engagement' stage. In conclusion, the complex performance testing of DL models reveals a significant relationship between signal complexity and model performance. This study underscores the importance of incorporating signal complexity analysis as a critical component in applying DL technology within machining processes, as it provides valuable insights into model performance. Graphical abstract:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.