ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Cortical activity increases in speech motor areas as a function of the subjective loudness of inner speech.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Inner speech, sometimes referred to as an inner monologue or silent verbal thinking, is a common mental phenomenon, often experienced as a faint auditory image of words as spoken in one's own or a more generic voice. Brain-scanning research has shown that inner speech activates many of the same cortical areas responsible for spoken speech. This neural overlap has been leveraged with considerable success recently to decode the content of inner speech from cortical activity using cutting-edge data-analytic methods so that totally paralyzed patients can communicate. The hypothesis underlying the current study is that efforts to create subjectively louder inner speech will be associated with greater neural activity in cortical areas associated with overt speech. Methods: While they were situated in an MRI scanner, we asked eight participants to repeat simple syllables as either soft or loud inner speech in a randomized order. For comparison purposes, the inner speech trials were followed by participants listening to a recording of the same syllables they made earlier, and a phase during which they repeated those syllables aloud. Results: As expected, we found significantly greater neural activity in cortical areas associated with speech motor activity during loud as compared to soft inner speech. We also that found greater suppression of neural activity in auditory perception areas was associated with louder inner speech. Discussion: The results are discussed with respect to their implications for the identification of inner speech in totally paralyzed individuals and the possibility of using neurofeedback to reduce the volume of negative inner speech.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.