ArticleSSM. Mental health2026
Restrictive abortion policy climate is associated with increased depression symptoms among women in the United States: Findings from a 25-year longitudinal study.
Article in SSM. Mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To examine associations between state-level abortion restrictiveness and depression among female participants in a large, US sample surveyed from 1990 to 2015. Methods: Eligible participants were female respondents in the Monitoring the Future panel study followed from adolescence into adulthood (N = 19,881 female respondents with 50,995 unique observations). Depression symptoms were assessed using a four-item index. State-level restrictive abortion policy climate was quantified using an annual index of 18 policies, standardized across states and years. We modeled associations using log-binomial multilevel models, adjusting for individual (e.g., race/ethnicity, age, urbanicity) and state-level (e.g., unemployment, income inequality, political and legislative composition, demographic composition, gender wage gap) confounders. We conducted tests to assess robustness of findings, including using a negative control outcome (motor vehicle crashes), alternative populations (male respondents), and subgroup tests by religiosity. Results: A one-standard deviation increase in state abortion restrictiveness (equivalent to approximately 4 more restrictive laws) was associated with a 7% increase in depression symptoms among females (adjusted risk ratio [RR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.11). As hypothesized, associations among our alternative sample were not statistically significant (males, RR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.99-1.08, though estimates did not statistically differ by sex) as were associations with our negative control outcome (motor vehicle crashes). As hypothesized, associations were most pronounced among female respondents reporting low religiosity (RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01-1.15), and not significant among those reporting high religiosity. Conclusion: Restrictive abortion policies are associated with higher depression symptoms among women. Legal protections for reproductive health care may benefit mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.