ArticleCureus2026
Evaluating a Structured Workflow Guide to Improve Junior Doctor Preparedness for Vascular Surgery Late Shifts: A Prospective Paired Pre-Post Interventional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Junior doctors covering vascular surgery late shifts, defined locally as shifts covering 12:00 to 22:00, often manage specialty-specific workflows with limited formal induction, including elective admissions, post-operative reviews, medication reconciliation, investigations, and escalation of complications. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a structured workflow guide improved junior doctors' preparedness and confidence in managing vascular surgery late shifts. Methods We conducted a prospective paired pre-post interventional study in a tertiary vascular surgery department. A structured workflow guide was developed and introduced at Foundation Year 1 (FY1) departmental induction. The guide covered shift workflow, electronic admission processes, pre-operative and post-operative review responsibilities, peri-operative medication guidance, investigation requirements, escalation advice, and use of an outpatient accommodation facility. Eight FY1 doctors completed a pre-intervention questionnaire before using the guide and a post-intervention questionnaire after one week. Survey items used a five-point Likert scale across ten preparedness and confidence domains. Supplementary survey items assessed self-reported clerking time and average escalations to senior colleagues per shift per person. Results Eight respondents completed both surveys. Median scores improved across all ten domains. The composite preparedness/confidence score increased from 19.5 (interquartile range (IQR) 17.5-21.5] pre-intervention to 46.0 (IQR 43.75-47.5) post-intervention, representing a statistically significant improvement (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, W = 0, p = 0.0078). Supplementary workflow survey items suggested reduced average clerking time from 1.8 to 1.2 hours and reduced average escalations to senior colleagues per shift per person from 5.25 to 3.5. Post-intervention usability scores were high, including median scores of 5.0 (IQR 5.0-5.0) for improved understanding of post-operative review priorities and recommendations to future FY1 doctors. Conclusions A structured workflow guide was associated with improved self-reported preparedness and confidence among FY1 doctors covering vascular surgery late shifts. Supplementary survey findings also suggested reduced clerking time and reduced reliance on senior escalation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.