ReviewVeterinary medicine international2026
Serum Sialic Acid as a Biomarker of Inflammation and Infection: Insights From Veterinary Medicine.
Review in Veterinary medicine international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Serum Sialic Acid as a Biomarker of Inflammation and Infection: Insights From Veterinary Medicine.Veterinary medicine international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serum sialic acid (SSA) levels, including total sialic acid (TSA), lipid-bound sialic acid (LBSA), and protein-bound sialic acid (PBSA), have been extensively studied as biomarkers of inflammation and infection across various species and diseases. In parasitemic sheep, elevated SSA levels likely reflect host-pathogen interactions and immune activation. Contrasting findings in bovine theileriosis demonstrated increased sialic acid (SA) levels during acute infections but decreased levels in severe parasitemia, suggesting variable responses based on parasitemia rates. SSA and LBSA levels in dogs significantly increase in babesiosis and dirofilariasis, indicating tissue damage and oxidative stress. Babesiosis, a tick-borne infection, shows SA elevations associated with inflammation and red blood cell destruction. Dirofilariasis, a heartworm disease, shows elevated SSA and LBSA levels, highlighting the importance of acute-phase proteins in disease severity. In avian species, diseases like Newcastle disease virus (NDV) infection, infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) infection, and bacterial challenges caused significant increases in SSA, LBSA, and PBSA levels, with LBSA showing the most pronounced changes, indicating its high sensitivity to inflammatory processes. Japanese quail with omphalitis also demonstrated elevated LBSA, highlighting its diagnostic potential in avian inflammation. Cattle with conditions such as traumatic reticuloperitonitis, acute metritis, pneumonia, and babesiosis exhibited markedly elevated SA and APP levels, consistent with findings in mastitis, colisepticemia, and leptospirosis, where APP levels correlated with disease severity. Tissue damage associated with increased SA is closely linked to inflammation and infection. These changes may also influence receptor-ligand interactions during infection, supporting SA as a useful biomarker for disease monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.