Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42148149›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2026

Evolving computational paradigms for noncoding variant pathogenicity prediction.

Beibei Wang, Siyuan Song, Song Cheng, Yihang Lin, Liang Yu, Yan Li, Xiang Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Beibei WangSchool of Management, Xi'an Polytechnic University, Xian, Shaanxi, China.
Siyuan SongYangtze Delta Region Institute (Quzhou), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Quzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Song ChengYangtze Delta Region Institute (Quzhou), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Quzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yihang LinYangtze Delta Region Institute (Quzhou), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Quzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Liang YuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xian, Shaanxi, China.
Yan LiSchool of Management, Xi'an Polytechnic University, Xian, Shaanxi, China.
Xiang ChenYangtze Delta Region Institute (Quzhou), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Quzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid expansion of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has highlighted the important contribution of noncoding variants to human disease, yet their pathogenic mechanisms remain difficult to resolve. Traditional statistical and experimental approaches often struggle to capture complex regulatory interactions or establish causal links, leaving many noncoding variants classified as variants of uncertain significance in clinical databases. Recent advances in computational modeling have substantially improved pathogenicity prediction by integrating genomic, epigenetic, and structural information. In parallel, genome language model (gLM)-inspired methods have enabled more context-aware interpretation of noncoding sequences and improved model generalization. This review summarizes current computational approaches, data modalities, and evaluation strategies for noncoding variant pathogenicity prediction, discusses key challenges in interpretability and data heterogeneity, and highlights emerging opportunities for clinical translation.

Indexed as

clinical translationcomputational modelinggenome language modelsnoncoding variantspathogenicity prediction

Identifiers

PMID42148149
PMCPMC13171353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.