ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Validation of LILR antibody specificities and development of LILRA3-specific antibodies.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leukocyte immunoglobulin (Ig)-like receptors (LILRs) constitute a family of 11 structurally related receptors predominantly expressed on immune cells. Despite their functional diversity, LILRs show a high degree of sequence homology within their extracellular domains, with amino acid sequence identities ranging from approximately 50% to nearly 100%. This molecular similarity poses a significant challenge for antibody-based detection, often resulting in cross-reactivity and misinterpretation of expression profiles. Nevertheless, a comprehensive assessment of antibody specificity across the entire LILR family has not been previously conducted. In this study, we performed a rigorous validation of commercially available antibodies to evaluate their specificity and cross-reactivity against all LILR family members. Using flow cytometry with LILR-transfected K562 cells, we reliably identified specific antibodies for LILRA2, LILRA4, LILRA5, LILRB1, LILRB2, and LILRB4. Notably, more than half of the commercial antibodies showed cross-reactivity. Given the lack of a reliable antibody for LILRA3, the only known soluble member of the family, we generated novel anti-LILRA3 monoclonal antibodies in mice. Three hybridoma clones exhibiting high specificity for LILRA3 were successfully isolated and validated. Using these antibodies, we established a sensitive sandwich ELISA, which successfully detected LILRA3 in individuals carrying functional alleles, while no protein was detected in those with the 6.7-kb deletion or premature termination codons. Moreover, serum concentrations of LILRA3 were substantially higher than previously reported. These findings not only provide essential tools for accurate detection of LILRA3 but also underscore the importance of rigorous antibody validation in LILR-related research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.