SynthesisProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2026
Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a significant global healthcare burden, with survival rates remaining alarmingly low despite resuscitation advancements. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intraosseous (IO) versus intravenous (IV) access for resuscitation on outcomes in OHCA. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data from studies retrieved from PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science up to August 2024. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for all outcomes. Results: Twenty-one studies with a total of 249,138 patients were included. Compared to IV access, IO access was significantly associated with lower survival to admission (RR: 0.80, 95% CI [0.70, 0.90], Conclusion: IO access was associated with worse survival and neurological outcomes compared to IV access in OHCA resuscitation. Further research is needed to optimize vascular access strategies in emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.