Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42148017›Full record

ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2026

Noninvasive imaging to confirm the technical outcomes of left atrial appendage exclusion following surgical closure.

Jennie A Hocking, J Michael DiMaio, Austin Kluis, Kortney Robinson, John Eisenga, Garry K Jett, Paulina Pawlikowski, David Moore, Kelley Hutcheson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jennie A HockingDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - Plano, Plano, Texas, USA.
J Michael DiMaioDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - Plano, Plano, Texas, USA.
Austin KluisBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Kortney RobinsonDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - Plano, Plano, Texas, USA.
John EisengaBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0950-8620
Garry K JettDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - Plano, Plano, Texas, USA.
Paulina PawlikowskiDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - Plano, Plano, Texas, USA.
David MooreDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - Plano, Plano, Texas, USA.
Kelley HutchesonDepartment of Cardiovascular Research, Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - Plano, Plano, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Closure of the left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation significantly decreases the rate of future complications. Exclusion success is typically evaluated via transesophageal echocardiography, an invasive procedure typically requiring patient sedation. We investigated left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion rates postoperatively utilizing cardiac computed tomography (CT). Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgical LAA closure. Closure techniques were compared utilizing postoperative cardiac CT. Successful closure was defined by remnant pouch <1 cm and absence of distal contrast flow. Rates of postoperative reintervention, thromboembolic events, and anticoagulation usage were also assessed. Results: Seventy-nine patients underwent surgical LAA closure and completed postoperative cardiac CT. Successful exclusion was seen in 60 of 64 patients (93.8%) receiving an epicardial-placed occlusion device and 12 of 15 (80%) undergoing primary surgical closure (2/2, 100%, pericardial patch; 10/13, 76.9%, internal suture ligation). Four exclusion failures of epicardial-placed occlusion devices were characterized by residual stump. Three failures with internal suture ligation were described as patent left atrial appendage orifice. Conclusions: Primary surgical closure trended toward a higher imaging failure rate compared to an epicardial occlusion device. Noninvasive CT imaging was useful to evaluate successful LAA closure. The ability to identify exclusion failure allows surgeons to refine operative techniques.

Indexed as

Atrial AppendageAtrial FibrillationLeft Atrial Appendage ClosureAgedEchocardiography, TransesophagealFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeArrythmiasatrial fibrillationimagingleft atrial appendage

Identifiers

PMID42148017
PMCPMC13174847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.