ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2026
Noninvasive imaging to confirm the technical outcomes of left atrial appendage exclusion following surgical closure.
Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trust, but verify: lessons from cardiac CT imaging after surgical left atrial appendage exclusion.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Closure of the left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation significantly decreases the rate of future complications. Exclusion success is typically evaluated via transesophageal echocardiography, an invasive procedure typically requiring patient sedation. We investigated left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion rates postoperatively utilizing cardiac computed tomography (CT). Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgical LAA closure. Closure techniques were compared utilizing postoperative cardiac CT. Successful closure was defined by remnant pouch <1 cm and absence of distal contrast flow. Rates of postoperative reintervention, thromboembolic events, and anticoagulation usage were also assessed. Results: Seventy-nine patients underwent surgical LAA closure and completed postoperative cardiac CT. Successful exclusion was seen in 60 of 64 patients (93.8%) receiving an epicardial-placed occlusion device and 12 of 15 (80%) undergoing primary surgical closure (2/2, 100%, pericardial patch; 10/13, 76.9%, internal suture ligation). Four exclusion failures of epicardial-placed occlusion devices were characterized by residual stump. Three failures with internal suture ligation were described as patent left atrial appendage orifice. Conclusions: Primary surgical closure trended toward a higher imaging failure rate compared to an epicardial occlusion device. Noninvasive CT imaging was useful to evaluate successful LAA closure. The ability to identify exclusion failure allows surgeons to refine operative techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.