ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2026
Investigation of Bisphosphonate Therapy for Osteoporosis: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to examine the management of bisphosphonate (BP) therapy for osteoporosis in Japan, focusing on treatment duration, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assessment status, therapy despite renal impairment, and history of atypical femoral fracture (AFF). Methods: This single-center, cross-sectional study included 117 women inpatients aged ≥ 65 years admitted to the Department of General Medicine at Nerima Hikarigaoka Hospital between October 2022 and September 2025 while receiving BP therapy. The primary outcome was the prevalence of ultra-long-term therapy (≥ 10 years oral or ≥ 6 years intravenous). Secondary outcomes included long-term therapy (≥ 5 years oral or ≥ 3 years intravenous), unknown treatment duration, inadequate DXA assessment, therapy despite renal impairment (serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL), and AFF history. Results: The mean age was 84.3 ± 7.1 years. Ultra-long-term therapy occurred in 5.1% of patients, long-term therapy in 23.1%, unknown treatment duration in 29.9%, and inadequate DXA assessment in 49.6%. Therapy despite renal impairment was noted in 6.8%, and one patient (0.8%) had AFF. Unknown treatment duration and inadequate DXA assessment were significantly more common in nonorthopedic care and in facility- or home-based settings ( Conclusions: Among older women in Japan, ultra-long-term BP therapy was rare; however, nearly half lacked adequate assessment of treatment duration or documented DXA evaluation. These findings reveal shortcomings in long-term osteoporosis management, particularly in nonorthopedic and facility- or home-based care settings. Standardized reassessment, appropriate DXA evaluation, and improved information sharing across care transitions are essential to optimize treatment quality and safety in an aging population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.