ArticleFrontiers in allergy2026
Cultural sensitivity and patient-centered care regarding incense and candle smoke emissions.
Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incense and candles are commonly utilized for relaxation, deodorization, aesthetics, and religious observance. Both are used ubiquitously and viewed innocuously. However, both modalities release a multitude of compounds, including carbon monoxide, benzene, acrolein, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, that carry documented risks for cardiovascular disease, pulmonary dysfunction, and cancer. Incense particulate matter generates 45 mg/g vs. 10 mg/g from cigarette smoke. The following two clinical cases illustrate this challenge: an 87-year-old woman with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma whose acute dyspnea was temporally associated with incense burning during ancestral worship and a 31-year-old atopic asthmatic woman whose symptoms were repeatedly triggered by meditative relaxation through lighting candles. For many patients worldwide, these practices are inseparable from cultural identity and religious devotion, rendering simple cessation counseling insufficient. This article explores the current evidence on health hazards from incense and candle smoke, synthesizes their cultural and religious significance across major traditions, and proposes a structured framework for clinician communication. Practical recommendations, including electronic alternatives, burn duration reduction, improved ventilation, and culturally sensitive phrasing, are presented to help clinicians navigate these conversations effectively. A summary table comparing health risks, cultural roles, and alternative options is provided as a practical clinical reference. Recognizing the cultural and religious significance of incense and candle use across diverse populations is a prerequisite for delivering care that is both clinically effective and respectful of patient values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.