ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026
Motor Control in Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Domain Based Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Mechanism Specific Effects.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Persistent deficits in motor control following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction suggest that conventional rehabilitation approaches fail to address underlying neurocognitive and sensorimotor mechanisms. However, how different rehabilitation strategies influence these mechanisms remains unclear. Methods: A systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating motor control targeted rehabilitation interventions in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or relevant populations were included. Interventions were classified into five domains based on their primary mechanisms: motor learning, neuromuscular training, cognitive and dual task approaches, feedback based interventions, and environment mediated strategies. Outcomes were synthesized across biomechanical, sensorimotor, and functional domains. Results: Seven studies were included. Interventions demonstrated domain specific effects, with no single approach producing consistent improvements across all outcomes. Motor learning interventions improved movement performance and lower extremity kinematics, while cognitive and dual task approaches influenced both biomechanical and postural control outcomes. Neuromuscular training improved proprioception, whereas feedback based and environment mediated interventions showed more context specific effects. Improvements in objective outcomes were not consistently associated with patient reported measures. Conclusion: Motor control rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is mechanism dependent rather than intervention dependent. A domain-based framework provides a structured basis for aligning rehabilitation strategies with specific functional targets and may enhance the precision and effectiveness of rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.