Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42147959›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

Dual-discriminator network-based classification method for breast ultrasound imaging.

Xue Zhao, Huanyu Zhao, Zhiying Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xue ZhaoDepartment of Medical Imaging, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, China.
Huanyu ZhaoDepartment of Medical Imaging, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, China.
Zhiying ChengDepartment of Medical Imaging, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is a malignant tumor with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early detection and diagnosis via ultrasound imaging are crucial for effective treatment and improved patient outcomes. Transferring learning from large natural image datasets to smaller medical datasets has been a common strategy to enhance model performance due to the scarcity of labeled medical images. However, there are several challenges in applying these methods to medical image classification, including the small dataset size, data imbalance, the need for strong feature extraction capabilities, and the necessity for model interpretability. This study aims to address data imbalance and enhance both the accuracy and interpretability of breast ultrasound image classification for breast cancer diagnosis. Methods: We introduce a novel Dual-Discriminator Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) for iterative data synthesis on unbalanced datasets. We introduce channel and spatial attention mechanisms to recognize intricate details during classification. Extensive experiments on various benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art methods. Our method shows improved performance on both the Breast Ultrasound Images Dataset (BUSI) and our self-constructed dataset. Results: Our method achieved a top accuracy of 96.0% on the BUSI dataset and 95.8% on our self-constructed evaluation dataset. Conclusions: Qualitative evaluation through visualization methods further supports the practical diagnostic value of our method in identifying relevant image features for classification.

Indexed as

Breast cancerdata synthesisdeep learningtransfer learningultrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID42147959
PMCPMC13178412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.