ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Multicenter-derived machine learning model for individualized rupture-risk prediction in intracranial aneurysms: study protocol and preliminary validation.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) account for approximately 85% of all spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) cases and are associated with poor outcomes, including death, in up to 25-50% of patients. Rupture risk is influenced by a variety of factors and exhibits substantial inter-patient variability. In this study, we aimed to develop a prediction model for IAs rupture risk by integrating clinical, computed tomographic angiography (CTA) morphological, and radiomics features, and to evaluate the consistency of predictive performance across multiple machine learning (ML) algorithms. Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, 756 consecutive patients with 877 IAs were enrolled from three centers between January 2020 and November 2024. Clinical, morphological, and radiomics features were extracted. Independent risk factors for IAs rupture were identified, and six predictive models were constructed using logistic regression (LR). A nomogram incorporating significant clinical, morphological, and radiomics score (Radscore) predictors was developed. To evaluate model robustness, seven additional ML algorithms were applied to the clinical-morphological-radiomics model (Model_C&M&R) features for comparative analysis. Results: Age, admission blood glucose, aneurysm diameter, location, parent artery average diameter, and ten radiomics features were identified as independent predictors of IAs rupture (P<0.05). Model_C&M&R achieved the highest predictive performance in both the training set [area under the curve (AUC) =0.887] and the internal validation set (AUC =0.910). It also demonstrated consistent generalizability in external validation sets I (AUC =0.773) and II (AUC =0.735). Among the seven ML algorithms applied to the Model_C&M&R feature set, five models exhibited strong performance in the internal validation set. Conclusions: The integrated Model_C&M&R provides optimal predictive accuracy for IAs rupture, and the prediction models developed utilizing various ML algorithms demonstrate consistently excellent performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.