ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Multi-scale generative adversarial network: three-dimensional reconstruction of the scoliotic spine from biplanar X-rays.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) causes lateral spinal curvature, affecting adolescent growth, nerve function, and cardiopulmonary health, with an incidence of 1% to 3% in adolescents. Accurate three-dimensional (3D) spinal assessment is critical for AIS management, yet clinical imaging faces dilemmas. Specifically, two-dimensional (2D) X-rays lack 3D information due to vertebral overlap, while computed tomography (CT) involves excessive ionizing radiation that increases tumor risks in adolescents. Existing biplanar X-ray-based 3D reconstruction methods suffer from feature fusion loss and poor adaptability to scoliotic deformities. This study aimed to develop a low-radiation and high-precision deep learning framework for 3D spinal reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays. Methods: We proposed a multi-scale generative adversarial network (MS-GAN) to reconstruct 3D spinal CT volumes from two orthogonal X-rays of both normal and scoliotic spines. The model incorporates three innovative designs: a residual-dense encoder for retaining fine vertebral details, an adaptive cross-view fusion module for integrating orthogonal projections, and a multi-scale fusion discriminator (MSFD) to ensure structural consistency. It was validated on a mixed dataset including 1,087 normal spines from CTSpine1K and clinical AIS data covering 138 cases with Cobb angles ranging from 15° to 85°. Reconstruction performance was evaluated using mean squared error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and Dice coefficient (Dice). Clinical applicability was further assessed using sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), and thoracic kyphosis (TK) measurements on 38 real biplanar X-ray cases. We compared the performance gap between the model on real clinical data and simulated data, and verified the effectiveness of the model improvement through ablation experiments. Results: Compared to the baseline X2CT-GAN, MS-GAN achieved a 30% reduction in MSE; its PSNR reached 73.20 dB, an improvement of 12.2%; its SSIM reached 0.956, an improvement of 5.5%; and its Dice reached 0.92, an improvement of 8%. Analysis demonstrated strong agreement between reconstructed spines and CT gold standards, with mean differences of -0.198 mm for SVA, 0.087° for LL, and 0.095° for TK. When applied to real clinical X-rays, performance decreases remained within 5% for key metrics. And the results of the ablation experiment demonstrated the effectiveness of the model improvement. Conclusions: MS-GAN resolves feature fusion and dimension mismatch in biplanar X-ray 3D reconstruction, with robust performance on scoliotic spines. It avoids CT radiation and reduces equipment reliance, providing a low-cost, high-precision tool for AIS assessment and is valuable for primary hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.